In All Together – an account of culture change at the Royal Shakespeare Company – the story of Cake Friday leaps out. As the name suggests, as part of a wider move towards ‘ensemble’ working throughout the organisation, Cake Friday involved all staff being invited to come together on Friday afternoons and eat cake together. Some people loved this opportunity to meet informally, others saw it as a waste of time or felt frustrated in not being able to join in. Cake Friday was a flash point, underlining deeper cultural differences within the organisation.
As I was writing up the first draft of my report in joint leadership models (which I’ll publish on this blog in March) I tweeted about how I’d managed to get a reference to Cake Friday into the report. ‘For us at Lichfield Festival it was Cake Thursday’ someone replied. When I was Head of a team at NCVO we had ‘greasy spoon Fridays’ when we would dine together in the finest cafes Caledonian Rd could offer and talk about everything but work. That’s why Cake Friday resonated for me – those informal get togethers with no clear purpose other than to get to know your colleagues better and catch up with one another’s news can be incredibly valuable. And MMM’s recent report into collaboration confirms the importance of both formal and informal communication.
This made me wonder what other formal and informal ways people had to foster collaboration within (and beyond) their organisations?
For my report I’ve started drafting a table of what collaborative leadership looks like within an organisation which covers structural issues like how roles are defined and who takes decisions – but also some ‘softer’ meausres around how things are done and what it feels like to work in this kind of organisation.
What does good collaborative leadership look like in an organisation?
| Area | Governance/ structure | Operations/ systems | Behaviour/ culture |
| Vision | Leaders (Board and Executive) and have ambitious goals for full vision including the audiences and organisational context.
Leaders emerge and recruited from full range of disciplines relevant to vision (e.g. learning or audience engagement). |
Single leaders ultimately responsible for full vision including audiences and resources.
Joint leaders both responsible for overall vision, albeit with different roles. |
Whole organisation owns vision and understands how their role relates to it.
Leaders show respect for full range of organisational activity, not just areas of their own expertise. Leaders able to separate their personal motivations from organisational aims. |
| Strategy (e.g. programming) | Strategy developed jointly by those with responsibility for artistic quality, learning, resources (finance/human) and audiences. This includes programming. | Measures of success – and monitoring – reflect full vision.
Regular programming meetings which plan future and manage current activity. Planning and performance-management systems support programming (e.g. financial targets for earned and raised income relate to programme). |
Specialist staff (e.g. curators, marketing staff) seek and welcome views of colleagues.
Whole organisation understands and supports strategies including: audience development, fundraising, programming etc Rationale for strategy – e.g. programming decisions openly discussed. |
| Projects | Cross-organisation project teams develop and deliver together. Not necessarily led by the artistic team. | Regular project team meetings. Formal and informal conversations between teams and individuals. | Allegiance to organisation and focus on projects not functional compartments. |
| Human resources | Role clarity, task ambiguity.
Staff capacity in different teams reflects requirements of mission. |
All staff have equal status: in terms of pay and rewards structures, and benefits.
CPD encouraged for all staff including common areas of competence for managers and leaders. 360 degree appraisals ‘Learning organisation’ |
High levels of discretionary effort and commitment, including volunteering.
Leaders provide timely and specific positive feedback to others. People encouraged to innovate and take risks by learning culture and lack of blame. |
| Financial resources | Delegated authority for securing and managing budgets. | Planning systems (budget and work-planning) incentivises entrepreneurial behaviour and Value For Money. | Financial literacy, accountability developed in all staff and entrepreneurialism expected of all. |
In my research I’ve identified examples of organisations already displaying these characteristics include the following:
- Use of cross-cutting project teams for project development and delivery at British Museum (where they are never chaired by the exhibition curator), Bluecoat, Turner Contemporary, Battersea Arts Centre and Arnolfini.
- Securing high levels of discretionary effort and volunteering by virtue of their leadership approach e.g. Ryedale Folk Museum and Museum of East Anglian Life.
- Encouraging innovation by developing a learning organisation approach among its team e.g. Tate’s new Learning Strategy.
- Delegated authority for managing budgets: Battersea Arts Centre has introduced core finance training for all staff to encourage them to take on more financial responsibility for their activities. Similarly SAGE Gateshead has found shifting aspects of income generation responsibility (e.g. venue hire) from the business development team to artistic teams to produce less internal conflict and better financial returns.
- Succession planning. Several leaders interviewed saw ensuring that the organisation was resilient and able to operate without them as among their key priorities: including for one Director who was only recently arrived in post.
- Encouraging understanding of the audience through all staff ‘walking the shop floor’ at Turner Contemporary where all staff are encouraged to give gallery tours to the public.
- Promoting understanding of one another’s roles through job shadowing e.g. at Northern Stage.
In and of themselves these might sound like small steps, but they amount to something larger. And if the small details aren’t in tune with the bigger picture then discord soon sets in.
I’d be interested to hear whether people recognise these features within their own organisations – and what other indicators you might suggest are missing? Do you have an equivalent of Cake Friday?



Loading...
Recent Comments